On April 23, 1951, actor John Garfield (The Postman Always Rings Twice, Body and Soul, Gentleman's Agreement, Force of Evil) spent the better part of the day being grilled by the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC). Heartless committee members
put Garfield's past memberships, political associations and financial contributions under the microscope, seeking to trip him up and get him to admit that he was a member of the Communist Party. By 1951, members of HUAC firmly believed that there were communists under every bed, and that Hollywood was doing everything in its power to inject Marxist ideology into motion pictures. Somewhat prior to Garfield's all-day testimony, members of HUAC had learned from "expert" witness Adolphe Menjou that a "communist actor" like Garfield could add subversive elements to a film through a “look, an inflection, or a
change in voice.” Committee members browbeat Garfield -- a not particularly well-educated or worldly man -- to such an extent that he became unemployable. (Note: Garfield would succumb to a massive heart attack a year later at age 39. To this day, many believe his death was due in large measure to the ordeal HUAC put him through.)
When Garfield's hearing concluded and the cameras shut down, HUAC members -- the very men who had heartlessly subjected the man born Jacob Julius Garfinkle to hour upon hour of contumelious accusations -- actually stood in line seeking the actor's autograph, shaking his hand, and quarreling over who was going get the honor of taking take him out to dinner.
In other words, Garfield, a man the committee sought to portray as a dangerous subversive bent on the destruction of America when the cameras were on, was a most welcome dinner companion at day's end; too evil to be seen on the screen, but just fine for a feast. I guess all's fair in love and war . . . and political grandstanding.
Talk about heartlessness.
In doing research on Garfield -- as well as Edward G. Robinson, Danny Kaye, Judy Holliday and scores of other Hollywood icons -- for a new book tentatively entitled In the Land of Mink-Lined Pools, I can't help but shudder at the heartless hypocrisy, the affected dishonesty visited upon poor "Julie" Garfinkle by his HUAC accusers. It also brings to mind so many others in the political arena whose public posture is at stunning odds with their private predilections -- those who publicly decry a lack of morality or self-sufficiency in American society and culture while privately engaging in -- or benefiting from -- the very activities they revile.
When it comes to this degree of heartlessness, former Vice President Dick Cheney takes the cake. Cheney, a conservative's conservative, is one of our country's all-time "chicken hawks." He has long found war to be both totally correct and personally profitable. And yet, between 1959 (when he first became eligible for the draft) and
1967, he gladly accepted 5 deferments: 4 because he was a student and 1 because he was a new father. How different is this from the heartless HUAC members who, after thoroughly sliming John Garfield, then stood in line begging for his autograph and a chance to grab a bite at the Hawk 'n Dove?
In addition to lacking a heart when it comes to war, Cheney is also one of those who is fervently anti-union and hyper free market; one who believes with every fiber of his being that government is not meant to provide a social safety net -- whether it be Social Security, Medicaid, Medicare or Obamacare. In a recent interview on NBC's "Today Show," Cheney called the Tea Party and its fierce opposition to government spending a "good thing." He also noted how the Tea Party made possible the insurgent Wyoming Senate campaign of his daughter Liz because she was "partly motivated" by the same concerns about high taxes, high national debt and the cost of the Affordable Care Act.
Out of that zeal to repeal Obamacare, the Tea Party and its congressional adherents provoked this month's government shutdown and near credit default. Yet, Cheney declared, "I've got a lot of respect for what the people are doing."
Where's the heart? Dick Cheney's family would never have escaped the financial ravages of the Depression if it were not for the Federal Government, for which his father worked for more than 30 years. Indeed, the Cheney family was so indebted to Franklin Roosevelt and the New Deal that, according to Dick, "When I was born [on Jan. 30, 1941] my Granddad wanted to send a telegram to the president. Both sides of my family were staunch New Deal Democrats, and Granddad was sure that FDR would want to know about the 'little stranger' with whom he now had a birthday in common."
Somewhere along the way, Dick Cheney decided to stand in staunch opposition to much of that which helped make his family solidly middle-class. It would seem that as his physical heart weakened and his health became severely compromised -- he's had at least 5 heart attacks since age 37 and underwent a successful heart transplant less than 2 years ago -- that Dick Cheney's figurative heart turned to stone. How in the world can anyone who has repeatedly come back from the brink of death thanks to government provided health insurance and care, also stand foursquarely against healthcare for others? If it were not for Dick Cheney's government insurance -- or the cadillac coverage he received during his years with Halliburton -- he would likely have become a member of the celestial choir years ago. Goodness knows, were it not for government health insurance -- or the vast wealth he acquired from his brief tenure in the private sector -- Dick Cheney would have been denied coverage due to a preexisting condition. And as for paying for a heart transplant out of his own pocket, even with his vast wealth (he's worth a minimum of $50 million) the very costly procedure would likely have been denied due to his age -- 71. According to recent figures, a heart transplant costs a minimum of $1 million.
Most anti-Obamacare folks have flatly concluded that as of January 2014 (when the Affordable Care Act goes into effect), heart transplants will either become a thing of the past or will bankrupt an already bankrupt government. How so many people know so much about what a program-yet-to-begin will be is beyond comprehension. Suffice it to say, many of those most fervently against government programs like Obamacare (which is in no way "socialized medicine" as Dick Cheney as his friends constantly claim) they are denying to millions the benefits they have gladly received for oh so many years.
It is reminiscent of those HUAC members who, once having destroyed the "evil" John Garfield, wanted nothing more than to shake his hand, get his autograph and take him to dinner.
Heartless is as heartless does.
How much the more so when you have to get a new one . . .
©2013 Kurt F. Stone
Many thanks to my lifelong friend Alad Wald for bringing this topic to my attention.
Contumelious???? Your vocabulary is second to none.
Posted by: Carole | October 31, 2013 at 07:09 PM
Good article.
And Dick Cheney is in favor of lesbian rights (but for his daughter only of course)
Posted by: Alan Wald | October 31, 2013 at 07:08 PM
Contumelious???? Your vocabulary is second to none.
Posted by: Carole | October 31, 2013 at 07:06 PM
The picture says it all! And then of course you do.
Posted by: Alan Weiss | October 30, 2013 at 09:34 AM
That's for the wonderful article on "Hearts" of Stone (pun intended)....Just makes one want to search out information about whose heart was sewn into Cheney's body....
Posted by: Paul | October 28, 2013 at 11:51 AM
I find it interesting that you would refer to the HUAC investigations and hearings with their obvious Anti-Semitic overtones as an analogy to smear Chaney but failed to acknowledge the horrid rampant & openly anti-Semitism of the members of the 73rd (68% dems) thru 79th (60% dems) congress during FDR's tenure. Every initiative that was Pro-Jew in any way was voted down. If not for FDR's early friendship with Henry Morgenthau, Jr, and his new found respect for Harold Ickes (a dyed in the wool Progressive Republican), who knows how WWII would have ended.
Certainly Morgenthau was not a Keynesian economist as noted in one of his most well known quotes:
"We have tried spending money. We are spending more than we have ever spent before and it does not work. And I have just one interest, and if I am wrong … somebody else can have my job. I want to see this country prosperous. I want to see people get a job. I want to see people get enough to eat. We have never made good on our promises. … I say after eight years of this Administration we have just as much unemployment as when we started. … And an enormous debt to boot."
(Oy Vey !! What would he say today with the debt going up one trillion bucks every year, and President Obama refuses to even consider even a reduction in the rate of increase of the spending. )
Morgenthau fought with the FDR administration and the Democrat majority congress to save the escaping Jews of Europe, but without success.
Harold Ickes was probably one of the 1st Civil Rights leaders in this country. Starting in Chicago and never stopping to the day he died. But he also had major arguments with FDR and the congress attempting to find alternative routes to save the Jews who were escaping the horrors of Nazism. He alone brought 1,000 refuges on the cruise liner "The St. Louis" to New York where they were transferred to an internment camp up state in Oswego.
So the two lonely FDR cabinets members who fought for the Jews were both anti-union, in favor of a balanced budget, against raising taxes to fund the war, but helped administer the New Deal and the PWA, and were known to be incorruptible, and probably incorrigible as well!
I must mention that it was the almost unanimous Republican vote that got the passage of LBJ's Civil rights Act of '64 and the Voting Rights Act of '65. I'm sure you recall that it was Al Gore's daddy along with that ex-KKKer, Robert Byrd who lead an unsuccessful 83 day filibuster against the Civil Rights Act. That was 83 days when nothing was accomplished in the US Senate - not just 21 hours.
These facts about FDR's administration and the Democrat Majority that controlled the US Congress during WWII are more important than Chaney's 5 deferments (and come on, how did you know that he "gladly" accepted the 5 deferments but lets see - do you think that Joe Biden "sadly" accepted his 5 deferments?), and why is it necessary to always refer to his tenure with Halliburton as if his job description included committing murder? Halliburton happens to be one of only 4 companies in the world that offer unique administrative services for the oil drilling industry. The others are French, British, and Swiss. Some company had to get the job. Would you have preferred that one of those got the job or would you prefer that a US company got the job.
Here are a couple of last things - Have you noticed how the Medicare related co-pays on meds has jumped up in the last 4 months? And how about 2 of my wife's 5 doctors who will not accept any new Medicare patients. And her cardiologist just left private practice and joined the Holy Cross Cardiac department. And a 36 yr old father of 4 (who installs for me) has been trying for over 2 weeks to sign up but as of yesterday stopped trying. And dear Secretary Sebelius just hired one of Mitt Romney's executives from Bane Capital to save Obamacare.
Posted by: Donald | October 28, 2013 at 09:17 AM
That's the problem, yours is a JOB, my position is as a citizen, unfettered by the RESPONSIBILTY of bashing a particular political party, and one who has voted both sides of the aisle. The JOB has blinded you, and all the other committed, straight liberals to the reality of what's happening on the ground, and the miserable direction into which the country is headed. BE GOOD TO YOURSELF, BE HONEST WITH YOURSELF.
Posted by: Chuck | October 28, 2013 at 08:59 AM
Another fool in the nation. So sad.
Posted by: Roz | October 28, 2013 at 08:51 AM
Love your e-mail about Dick Cheney.
It is especially interesting to me because I have just replied to
an e-mail from a good friend (male) who had forwarded to me
a message about Leonard Bernstein concerning Bernstein's
love life. My friend here did not know that I had written a graduate
paper on Bernstein because I "fell in love" with Bernstein when he conducted
the Boston Symphony in Philadelphia. This was, of course, much before
discussions about health insurance.
Merci beaucoup.
Posted by: Barbara M. | October 28, 2013 at 08:50 AM
Chuck: I don't have to write essays about ". . . probably one of the worst presidents in history." That's your job. I have mine.
Posted by: KFS to Chuck | October 28, 2013 at 08:18 AM
How you can find the time to write about Dick Cheney, when in the White House today, you probably have one of the worst presidents in history. He has mismanaged our Middle East relationships, his administration has yet to explain Bengazi, (see 60 minutes tonight),, has yet to explain the misbehavior of the IRS, has angered the Saudi's, has worsened the difficult China/Russian relationships, has angered our Euro allies, is mistrusted by Israel, and all those that depended on the strength and commitment of the U.S., and now in desperate fashion, quite anxious for some victory, will cave in to the Iranians on their nuclear ambitions, when now is the time to tighten the noose, as they and Rohani surely cannot be trusted. You can't blame Ted Cruz for this, nor the Tea party.
What we have here, is an aloof president, above his head on the world stage, an apologist for a nation that has given much to the world and sacrificed much for the good of humanity.
Posted by: Chuck | October 28, 2013 at 05:58 AM